Nanoclay-enhanced cement composition for deep well treatment

ABSTRACT

A cement slurry composition, containing hydraulic cement, water, and from 1 to less than 4% of an organically modified nanoclay. A method for cementing a high pressure high temperature well by pumping the cement composition of claim  1  between a casing and a formation of a well bore to fill a gap between the casing and the formation, and allowing the cement to harden.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Field of the Disclosure

The present invention relates to a cement nanoclay composition and amethod for cementing hydrocarbon-producing wells, under high pressureand high temperature (HPHT) conditions, using the cement and nanoclaycomposition. The cement-nanoclay composition comprises water, hydrauliccement, nanoclay, admixed silica flour, optionally admixed with at leastone additive selected from fluid loss agent, retarder, expanding agent,friction reducing agent, density reducing agents and weighting agents.

Description of Related Art

The “background” description provided herein is for the purpose ofgenerally presenting the context of the disclosure. Work of thepresently named inventors, to the extent it is described in thisbackground section, as well as aspects of the description which may nototherwise qualify as prior art at the time of filing, are neitherexpressly or impliedly admitted as prior art against the presentdisclosure.

The increased demand for oil and gas has led to exploration of petroleumreserves into high pressure and high temperature (HPHT) zones in deeperformations. Drilling into HPHT zones requires a special design of cementslurry. Several types of additives are being investigated and used inhigh pressure and temperature wells to cater to the extreme environment.

Petroleum production and exploration strongly affects the globaleconomic structure. Oil consumption increased by 171% during the periodfrom 1965 to 2008. Over the last two decades, the amount of oilconsumption per year has exceeded the amount of newly found oilreserves. With the continued growth of petroleum demand, oil and gascompanies are exploring in new or unexplored areas. However, the searchis proving to be extremely challenging in terms of depth, temperatureand pressure. In deeper wells, high temperature and pressure andpost-cementing operations put extreme stresses on the cement sheath andaffect the integrity of the cement. In such conditions, the design ofcement slurry is very critical and must have properties which ensuresthe durability and long term integrity of cement sheath.

In oil and gas wells after the well bore is completed, a pipe string isrun into the well bore and the cement slurry is pumped into the annularspace between the pipe casing and the formation rock in order to holdthe pipe string in its place. This process is referred to as “primarycementing”. The fluid cement slurry hardens as the chemical reactioninvolving the formation of calcium silicate hydrate (CSH), C₃S, C₂S andC₄AF takes place. The hardened cement sheath forms a layer separatingthe well bore formation and the casing, which is adhered firmly to theformation and the casing. The cement in the annular space holds thecasing in place, and being highly impermeable, prevents the transport ofcorrosive fluid from the formation to the casing, thereby precluding thecorrosion of the pipe string. It also provides a barrier which inhibitsthe migration of gases in the micro annulus between the formation andthe cement and the cement and pipe casing.

Cementing in HPHT wells is complicated due to wide ranging temperatureand pressure variations and stresses to which the annular cement sheath,between the casing and the formation, is subjected during its servicelife. The long-term integrity and durability of the annular cementdepends on providing casing support and preventing the migration offormation fluid in liquid or gaseous form through or at the boundariesof the cement sheath. The zonal isolation requires a robust cementslurry design which provides a strong and durable cement-casing andcement-formation bonding, precludes bulk shrinkage by inhibiting thefluid loss, has zero free water settling of cement, and formsmicroannulus due to stress imbalance at the interface resulting fromthermal regimes, hydraulic pressure or mechanical stresses. The hardenedcement slurry should also resist radial fracturing which may result fromshrinkage stresses, thermal expansion or contraction of the steel casingand pressure fluctuation, mechanical impact or other conditions withinthe casing. The HPHT wells have a larger probability of migration of gasand corrosive fluid and leakage. Therefore, special attention must bepaid to cementing processes, especially in HPHT wells. Studies haveshown that approximately 80% of the wells in the Gulf of Mexico have gastransmitted to the surface through the cement casing.

The appropriate cement slurry design for well cementing is a function ofvarious parameters, including the well bore geometry, casing hardware,formation integrity, drilling mud characteristics, presence of spacersand washers, and mixing conditions. Communications between zones, gasmigration, undesired fluid entry, strength retrogression and stressesare examples of the serious consequences resulting from poor cementingjobs in HPHT wells.

In order to ensure that the well safely produces hydrocarbons over itsservice life, it is necessary to ensure long-term durability of thecement composition. The cement sheath is subjected to large variationsin thermal regime, stresses are generated in the cement sheath from workover activities in the well, pressure testing, production and othermechanical loadings.

The compressive and tensile strength of the cement matrix are generallyconsidered to be indicative of the cracking in the cement and itspropagation. When the tensile stress in the cement matrix exceeds thetensile strength, which is itself evolving with time, cracking will takeplace in the cement. Toughness of the cement matrix is an importantmaterial parameter governing the initiation and propagation of thecracks in the cement.

Cementing of HPHT wells using hydraulic cements is not feasible due toretrogression in compressive strength of the cement at temperaturesexceeding 230° F. The hydrated lime released in the set cement may formalpha dicalcium silicate hydrate which results in strength retrogressionof the cement. The hydrated lime may also leach out of the cement sheathresulting in deterioration of the cement matrix, and thereby enhancingthe permeability which paves the way for the transport of gasses andcorrosive fluids.

Permeability of the cement matrix is the key parameter which isindicative of the potential of gas migration and fluid transport in thecement. The cement in the annular space of well bore and casingundergoes a transition from a fluid phase to solid phase. It isimportant that the permeability of the cement during this transition andafter it has achieved its full strength remains low to prevent thetransport of formation fluids through the pores of the cement.

Recently, nanomaterials have demonstrated effectiveness across a varietyof industries, from textiles and defense to aerospace and energy. Theyare now being used as commercially feasible solutions to technicalchallenges faced by many industries. Nanomaterials have high surfacearea and small size leading to beneficial properties which provides animpetus for its usage in oil and gas industry. Though nanotechnology hasshown its presence in other industries throughout a few decades, itsapplication in the oil and gas industry remains to be fully explored(Singh & Ahmed, 2010).

Development of high performance materials for construction is possibleby utilizing the potential of nanotechnology. Nano-materials (beingsmaller in size and higher in surface area) are used in several fields,including catalysis, polymers, electronics, and bio-medical applications(Park & Road, 2004). Because of a higher surface area, these materialscan also be used in oil/gas well cementing to accelerate the cementhydration process (Heinold. Dillenbeck, 2002). Due to their wide rangeof applications, they can help enhance final compressive strength andreduce fluid loss (Li & Wang, 2006: Campillo et al., 2007). Fewliterature reports are available mentioning nanomaterials in theconcrete industry. For example, Campillo et al., (2007) investigated theeffect of nano-alumina in belite cement. The study found that additionof nano-alumina enhances mechanical properties to some extent. Li etal., (2006) reported use of nano-SiO₂ or nano-Fe₂O₃ in cement mortar.The results showed improvement in compressive and flexural strengthcompared to plain cement mortar. Patil & Deshpande (2012), Senff et al.(2010) and Ershadi et al. (2011) have reported that addition ofnanomaterial such as nanosilica also results in a significant increasein the compressive strength of the cement mix and prevents strengthretrogression at high temperature.

Some of the examples of harnessing nanotechnology in drilling fluids(Singh & Ahmed, 2010) suggest that nanotechnology can bringrevolutionary changes to additive development.

The present disclosure demonstrates that a type of nanomaterial,referred to as nanoclay, helps improve the properties of cement inoil/gas wells subjected to HPHT conditions. A well located in SaudiArabia was selected to study the cement mixture design. Nanoclaymaterial was added at various percentages to the Saudi Type-G Cement andthe beneficial impact of nanoclay on the strength, rheological anddurability properties of the cement slurry was demonstrated.

BRIEF SUMMARY

The foregoing paragraphs have been provided by way of generalintroduction, and are not intended to limit the scope of the followingclaims. The described embodiments, together with further advantages,will be best understood by reference to the following detaileddescription taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.

An object of the disclosure is a slurry composition, comprising cement,water, and a montmorillonite nanoclay. It is organically-modifiednanoclay in which natural montmorillonite is modified with a quatemaryammonium salt.

In an embodiment the cement is admixed with at least one additiveselected from the group consisting of silica flour, fluid loss controladditives, retarder, expanding agent, density reducing additives,density enhancing weighting agents and friction reducing agent, anddefoaming/foaming agents.

In another embodiment the composition comprises Class G cement powder,nanoclay, silica flour, expanding agent, dispersant, fluid loss controlagent, retarder, and defoamer.

In one embodiment, a water to cement ratio is from 0.4 to 0.5.

Another object of the disclosure is a method for cementing a highpressure high temperature well, comprising pumping the cementcomposition between a casing and a formation of a well bore to fill agap between the casing and the formation, and allowing the cement toharden.

One aspect of the disclosure is a cement composition, comprising SaudiType-G cement and from 1 to less than 4% of organo-modified nanoclay,wherein the cement composition is in a dry form.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a graph showing a variation of thickening time for differentconcentrations of nanoclay: 0%, 1%, 2% and 3%.

FIG. 2 is a graph showing free water content behavior for differentconcentrations (percentages) of nanoclay.

FIG. 3 is a graph showing density of cement systems with and withoutnanoclay.

FIG. 4 is a graph showing yield point behavior.

FIG. 5 is a graph showing plastic viscosity behavior.

FIG. 6 is a graph showing gel strength variation for different nanoclayconcentration.

FIG. 7 is a graph showing G class cement compressive strength under UCA.

FIG. 8 is a graph showing compressive strength development of 1%nanoclay cement slurry at HPHT.

FIG. 9 is a graph showing compressive strengths at 24 and 48 hourshydration.

FIG. 10 is a graph showing destructive compressive strength variationwith respect to different nanoclay concentrations.

FIG. 11 is a graph showing permeability trend of nanoclay admixedslurries.

FIG. 12 is a graph showing porosity trend of nanoclay admixed slurries.

FIG. 13 is a structure of montmorillonite.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present invention relates to an oil and gas well cementingoperation, more specifically, to wells under high temperature highpressure condition, using a cement slurry composition in which nanoclayis used as an additive. The nanoclay based cement slurry can be used forprimary cementing and other well completion and remedial operations.

The present invention includes a slurry composition, comprisinghydraulic cement, water, and from 1 to 4% of an organomodifiedmontmorillonite based nanoclay. The cement of the composition isoptionally admixed with at least one additive selected from the groupconsisting of silica flour, fluid loss control additives, retarder,expanding agent, density reducing additives, density enhancing weightingagents and friction reducing agent, defoaming/foaming agents andcombination thereof, for application in oil and gas well cementing underhigh temperature and pressure conditions. Thus, the cement slurrycomposition may comprise Class G cement powder, nanoclay, silica flour,expanding agent, dispersant, fluid loss control agent, retarder, anddefoamer. The slurry composition yields superior cement slurryproperties, which include thickening time, free water separation,rheological properties, compressive strength, density, porosity andpermeability.

The density of the cement composition in the present invention can rangefrom 8 pounds per gallon (lb/gal) to about 20 lb/gal by using densityreducing additives, weighting agents or other means known to those ofordinary skill in the art. For high pressure high temperature wells, adensity of cement composition in excess of 16 lb/gal is generallyrequired for generating adequate hydrostatic pressure for balancingformation pressure in a well bore.

Saudi Type-G cement as used herein is oil field cement and is referencedto American Petroleum Institute (API) classification. No additions otherthan calcium sulfate or water, or both, is interground or blended withthe clinker during manufacture of Class G well cement. The Saudi Type-Gcement of the present disclosure is preferably in the form of a drypowder. The cement powder is of moderate-sulfate-resistant grade (MSR)or high-sulfate-resistant grade (HSR). The Class-G cement comprises atleast one selected from the group consisting of magnesium oxide, sulfurtrioxide, tricalcium silicate, and tricalcium aluminate.

The present disclosure has found that Saudi Type-G cement admixed withdifferent percentages of nanoclay improves the physical properties ofcement slurry and helps in designing the new cement system. Thenanoclay-containing cement can be advantageous for use in wells underhigh pressure and temperature conditions. The nanoclay based cementdesign can be prepared and implemented in the field without adverseeffects.

Nanoclays are nanoparticles of layered mineral silicates. Depending onchemical composition and nanoparticle morphology, nanoclays aregenerally organized into several classes such as montmorillonite,bentonite, kaolinite, hectorite, and halloysite. Bentonite andmontmorillonite clay have high expansion.

Embodiments of the cement composition of the present invention furthercomprises 2D nanomaterials in the form of nanolayers and nanoplates forexample, bentonite in dry powder form. Bentonite is a naturallyoccurring nanoclay which is obtained from the deposition and alterationof volcanic ash in the sea beds, formed several million years ago. It isa fine grained material which transforms into plastic state when wet. Itconsists essentially of silica, alumina, and water and lesser qualitiesof iron, magnesium, sodium and potassium. It is composed principally ofalumino-silicate materials, with particle size less than 2 to 10microns. Bentonite contains montmorillonite, glass, illite, kaolinite,quartz, zeolite and carbonates.

The nanoclay used in the embodiment belong to the family of smectiteclay, for example, montmorillonite, saporites, hectorite, bentonite andnontronite formed by mafic igneous rocks rich in Ca²⁺ and Mg²⁺. Weaklinkages by cations Na⁺ and Ca²⁺ results in high swelling/shrinkagepotential. The smectite clay is a 2:1 clay with two tetrahedral and oneoctahedral layer. In the octahedral layer Al³⁺ is substituted by Fe²⁺and Mg²⁺ and in the tetrahedral layer Al³⁺ is substituted for Si⁴⁺.

Embodiments of cement composition may consist of montmorillonitenanoclay. The montmorillonite is a natural phyllosilicate extracted frombentonite. It belongs to smectite family of an expandable 2:1 clay.Montmorillonite can expand several times its original volume, when itcomes in contact with water. The layered montmorillonite comprises alayer of edge shared alumina octahedral sheet sandwiched between twosilica-tetrahedral sheets. The apical oxygen atom of the silicatetrahedral sheets are all shared with the octahedral sheet (FIG. 13).The alumino-silicate layers of montmorillonite are approximately 1 nmthick with lateral dimension length/width of 200 nm. The primaryparticle may be from 8 nm to 10 nm in thickness. The montmorillonite inpowder form has a particle size from 100 nm to 10 microns. The stackedalumino silicate sheets of montmorillonite, therefore, have a highaspect ratio and plate like morphology.

The nanoclay in the embodiment may further comprise organically modifiednanoclay (organoclays) available commercially. The commercial nanoclaysare treated with quaternary ammonium comprising hydrocarbons(Tallow-oil) up to 40% by weight content. Organomodified nanoclay is aclass of hybrid organic inorganic nanomaterials, which has a strongpotential for modifying the rheology of cement and can act as adefoamer.

The organophilization of montmorillonite clay increases the clay basalspacing and the distance between the silicate galleries. Theorganomodified nanoclay is used extensively in nanocomposites forautomotive, aerospace and package industries and in plastics forproviding mechanical reinforcement, barrier properties and flameretardant.

The nanoclay is obtained principally from bentonite by selective miningfollowed by purification and surface treatment. The montmorillonitebased nanoclay consists of approx. 1 nm thick alumino-silicate layers,surface substituted with metal cations and stacked in approx. 10 micronsize multilayer stacks.

The nanoclay used in this embodiment is derived from montmorillonite, alayered magnesium aluminum silicate that is hydrophilic in nature and isorganically modified by cation exchange reaction to transform it ashydrophobic nanoclay. The nanoclay based on natural montmorillonite clayis a hydrated sodium, calcium, aluminum, and magnesium silicatehydroxide which is modified by quaternary ammonium salt.

The nanoclay in the embodiment may be commercially available,organically modified nanoclay, for example Cloisite 30B from SouthernClay Products, USA. The montmorillonite-based nanoclay is modified withmethyl, Tallow (˜65% C18, ˜30% C16, ˜5% C14), bis 2-hydroxyethylquarternary ammonium chloride. The nanoclay in the embodiment may bewhite or off white in color, with a density of 1.98 g/cm³, d-spacing(0011) of 1.85 nm, aspect ratio ranging from 200 to 1000, surface areaof 750 m²/g and mean particle size of 6 microns.

A cement composition in accordance with the present embodiment mayconsists of appropriate percentages of nanoclay to achieve themechanical properties, stability and rheological properties required forcementing the wells under HPHT conditions. For example the nanoclay maybe present in cement composition in the range of 1% to 10% and inparticular from 1% to 3% by weight of cement.

The organically modified hydrophobic nanoclay has multilayer stacks ofplates in which the thickness of the plate may range from 0.5 nm to 1.0nm. In certain embodiments it may have a thickness of 1 nm to 2.0 nm andin other embodiments it may have a thickness of <1 nm. These nanometerthick nanolayers may have width or length ranging from about 2 micronsto 10 microns.

The cement slurry in the embodiment may use fresh water or salt water insufficient quantity to produce a cement mix which can be easily pumpedto depths up to 10,000 meters. The water to cement ratio may range fromabout 0.5 to 0.7. In certain embodiments it may range from 0.4 to 0.5 byweight of cement.

For HPHT cementing the cement composition in the present invention mayhave a host of different additives to impart properties to the cementslurry to ensure its pumpability, durability and long-term integrity.The additives may include weighting agents to impart high densityrequired for balancing the formation pressure, silica flour or otherappropriate additives to ensure that long-term strength retrogression ofthe cement mix is precluded under HPHT conditions, retarders,accelerators, or friction reducing agent to ensure that the slurryremains pumpable without extensive wait on cement time, fluid lossadditives to ensure exclusion of gas migration and zonal isolationthroughout the life of the wall and dispersants to ensure the slurrystability.

The nanoclay of the present disclosure is used for cementing oil wellsunder a high pressure up to 10,000 psi, preferably of from 7000 to10,000 psi, especially preferably up to 9500 psi, at a high temperatureup to 350° F., preferably of from 250 to 350° F., especially preferablyup to 310° F. An amount of the nanoclay is from >1 to <4%, preferablyfrom 1 to 3.5%, especially preferably from 1.5 to 3%, by weight ofcement. An amount of >1% nanoclay yields superior results, such aslonger thickening time, improvement of rheological properties, andincreased gel strength and compressive strength. However, an amount of4% or more of nanoclay results in a slurry that is thick andnon-pourable. 4% or more of nanoclay requires a higher water cementratio to achieve flowability which compromises other properties such ascompressive strength.

Example

A cement design of typical oil/gas well in Saudi Arabia was selected totest the behavior of nanoclay on cement design performance. Thespecifications of wells are given in Table 1.

TABLE 1 Well Specifications Well Parameters Values Depth of well (TVD)14000 ft. Bottom hole circulating temperature (BHCT) 228° F. Bottom holestatic temperature (BHST) 290° F. Time to reach bottom (TRB) 49 min.Surface pump pressure 1050 psi Mud weight(MW) 85 pcf Bottom holepressure(BHP) 8265 psi

Cement Slurry Design

The particular well has a special cement system design since the well isdeep with higher pressure and temperature conditions. The selectedcement system consists of different materials in which each materialplays a role in modifying the chemical and physical properties to makethe cementing job successful. Table 2 explains the cement slurry designof a particular well without the addition of nanoclay.

TABLE 2 Cement Slurry Design without nanoclay Properties Values Slurry,Density(Approx.), PCF 125 Water Cement Ratio 0.44 Slurry Yield 1.367Thickening Time 4-5 hours Class G cement powder + 35% silica flour + 1%expanding agent + 0.8% Dispersant + 0.2% Fluid loss control agent + 0.5%Fluid loss control agent + 1% Retarder + 0.25 gm Defoamer

A series of tests was conducted on the above slurry design withoutnanoclay and is referred to as the base slurry design and used as areference. Nanoclay was incorporated in the above cement slurry designin different percentages by weight of cement (1%, 2%, 3% and 4%) asshown in Table 3.

TABLE 3 Cement Slurry Design with nanoclay Properties Values SlurryDensity(Approx.), PCF Unknown Water cement Ratio 0.44 Slurry YieldUnknown Thickening Time Unknown Class G cement powder + 35% silicaflour + X% Nanoclay + 1% expanding agent + 0.8% Dispersant + 0.2% Fluidloss control agent + 0.5% Fluid loss control agent + 1% Retarder + 0.25gm Defoamer *X in Table 3 represents the nanoclay percentages (1%, 2%,3% and 4%) by cement weight.

Cement Type and Additives

Saudi cement class G was used in experimental tests according toAmerican Petroleum Standards (API-10B, 2012). Tap water was used for theslurry preparation in all experiments. A number of conventional chemicaladmixtures along with nanoclay were used and their effects on theproperties of cement slurries were evaluated.

TABLE 4 Element Composition of Nanoclay Elements Concentration Si 31.82Al 11.82 Fe 5.84 Mg 1.04 Ca 0.42 Cl 0.58 Ti 0.12 S 0.04 K 0.04 Cr 0.02Zn 0.02 O 48.89

Sample Preparation

The cement slurry preparation is very important as the shear history ofthe mixture influences the properties of cement (Orban et al., 1986).The cement slurries were prepared using a variable speed high-shearblender type mixer with bottom drive blades as per the API (APISpecifications-10B, 2012). In all experiments, wet mixing method hasbeen implemented in which first of all, cement, additives and water areweighted depending on the cement design. The cement, silica flour andnanoclay were blended prior to mixing with water. The liquid and dryadditives which include fluid loss control additives, retarder,expanding agent, density reducing additives, density enhancing weightingagents and friction reducing agent, defoaming/foaming agents andcombination thereof were first mixed in tap water at a low speed of 4000rpm. The cement, silica flour and nanoclay dry blended mixture wassubsequently added to the water and additive mixture in the blenderwithin 15 seconds. The whole slurry was then mixed at high speed of12000 rpm for 35 seconds. After the mixing, the cement slurry wasconditioned in atmospheric consistometer at atmospheric pressure and194° F. temperature for 20 minutes to perform other tests such asrheology, density and compressive strength.

Thickening Time Test

The thickening time of cement slurry is the period within which cementslurry remains pumpable (Dwight, 1990). The thickening time test wasconducted using HPHT consistometer at 228° F. temperature and 9350 psipressure. The cement slurry was prepared according to API Specificationsand then poured into the cup and placed in HPHT consistometer and testconditions were applied as per the schedule. The test was conducted upto the time of achieving the 100 Bc consistency, the value that is thethickening time of cement slurry.

Density

The density describes the hydrostatic head of cement slurry in a well.It is measured using pressurized mud balance. First, the cement slurrywas prepared according to API Specifications. The slurry was conditionedat atmospheric pressure and 194° F. temperature. Then, conditionedslurry was poured in pressurized mud balance to obtain the density.

Free Water Content Test

After the conditioning of cement slurry, the cement was poured in agraduated cylinder and kept for 2 hours. At the end of the test, asyringe was used to extract the free water separated from the cementslurry and the amount of water was measured in milliliters (ml).

Rheological Test

The rheology determines the performance of cement and helps indetermining the pumpability of cement slurry. The rheological propertiesof the cement mix were determined using the HPHT Viscometer by Chandlerat high temperature conditions. The conditioned slurry was poured intopre-heated cylinder of Viscometer at the test temperature. TheViscometer was run at different shear rates and at the end of the test,inbuilt software is used to compute the results of plastic viscosity andyield point.

Compressive Strength Test

The compressive strength properties determine the integrity of cementand its ability to bear long-term imposed stresses (Adam, 1986). Thereare two methods to measure the compressive strength: (1) crushing and(2) a non-destructive method.

In the crushing method, the cement slurry was prepared and filled inmolds. The molds of cement were subjected to 290° F. and 3000 psipressure for 24 hours in a HPHT curing machine. The cubes were removedfrom the molds and crushed to obtain compressive strength.

The compressive strength of cement was also measured by thenon-destructive method by using an ultrasonic cement analyzer in whichthe cement slurry to be tested was placed in an autoclave unit of theultrasonic cement analyzer (UCA) with temperature and pressure adjustedto simulate downhole conditions. An acoustic signal was then transmittedthrough the cement sample. As the strength of the cement increased overtime, the faster the acoustic signal traveled through the sample. Inthis experiment, each test was conducted for 48 hours.

Porosity and Permeability Test

Permeability determines the ability of a fluid to flow at differentpressure and helps in determining the long-term performance of cement.The cement sheath is supposed to seal the zones and prevent fluidmigration under HTHP conditions, which is only possible if we have lowpermeability. The cylindrical cement cores are made from the cubes ofcement cured at HPHT conditions and then permeability and porosity testsare carried out on the automated porosimeter/permeameter at 500) psiconfining pressure.

Results

Two cement designs were considered as shown in Table 2 and Table 3, inwhich the difference between the two designs was the addition ofnanoclay in various percentages 1, 2, 3 and 4% BWOC (by weight ofcement) to the base mix. A dispersant percentage of 0.8% BWOC was keptconstant in all mixes. Cement slurry design of 1% nanoclay wassuccessful and gave good results. Cement slurry design with 4% nanoclaywasn't successful as the slurry produced was thick and non-pourable. The4% nanoclay cement system requires higher water cement ratio to achieveflowability which compromises other properties such as compressivestrength, evident from UCA tests conducted on the mix.

Effect of Nanoclay on Thickening Time

Four cement systems having nanoclay percentages of 0%. 1.0%, 2.0% & 3%BWOC were subjected to thickening time test and time of cement slurriesto reach a consistency of 100 BC were recorded. FIG. 1 shows the resultsof thickening time. It is observed that addition of nanoclay results inan increase in thickening time of slurries. The addition of nanoclayslows down the hydration of cement and retards the setting time ofcement slurries. For 3% nanoclay system, the slurry does not attainthickening time even after 9 hours. The addition of 1% nanoclayincreases the thickening time from 3 hours for the base slurry, to sixhours. The further addition of nanoclay by 2% BWOC increases thethickening time to around 8 hours. It can be observed that nanoclay actsas retarder that helps in deep well cementing by retarding thethickening time.

Effect of Nanoclay on Free Water Separation

FIG. 2 shows that the basic Class G cement slurry shows substantial freewater separation. However, when silica flour and nanoclay are mixed incement class G with other additives, there is no free water accumulatedat the top of slurry. The base mix without nanoclay shows no free wateras fluid loss control agents are incorporated in the mix. Theincorporation of nanoclay up to 3% does not show any change in thisbehavior and no bleeding or water took place.

Effect of Nanoclay on Density

The densities of four cement slurry systems having (0%, 1%, 2% & 3%)nanoclay percentages and Class G cement slurry is shown in FIG. 3. ClassG cement slurry does not give required density to bear the pressure ofdeep wells at 0.44 water to cement ratio. The base mix which is thecement system without nanoclay gives the density of 16.60 lb/gal. Whennanoclay is incorporated in base cement design, it decreases the densityof cement slurry. But the addition of nanoclay does not reduce thedensity value appreciably. For example the density of cement slurryhaving 3% nanoclay is reduced only by 1.25% as compared to the basecement mix (0% nanoclay).

Effect of Nanoclay on Theological Properties

Rheological measurements were made to determine the flow properties ofthe cement slurry such as plastic viscosity (PV), yield point (YP),frictional properties, gel strength, etc. Table 5 shows the plasticviscosity and yield point of five cement systems which is depictedgraphically in FIGS. 4 and 5, respectively. It can be observed fromthese figures that the addition of nanoclay to the base slurry resultedin improvement of rheological properties (PV and YP). The increase innanoclay percentage thickens the slurry and increases the rheologicalproperties of cement slurry and acts as a viscosifier.

It is evident from the results that simple G class cement slurry has alow plastic viscosity and high yield strength, which cannot improve themud displacement in these particular well conditions. Incorporation ofdifferent kinds of additives in Class G cement is needed to improve itsrheological properties. The addition of nanoclay to base cement systemresults in an increase in the plastic viscosity of cement. The yieldpoint is not affected significantly for 1% nanoclay, but with additionof more nanoclay (2% and 3%) the yield point increases changing from 9.5lbf/100 ft² for the base mix to about 16.4 lbf/100 ft² for 3% nanoclay.

Effect of Nanoclay on Gel Strength

Gel strength is a measure of the attractive forces in particles thatcause the development of gelatin when flow is stopped. It explains theforce required to initiate the flow after stopping circulation. The gelstrength test was conducted on Fann Viscometer and results are providedin FIG. 6. The results show that the addition of nanoclay in the basecement mix improves the gel strength on the cement slurry. The nanoclayaddition does not put noticeable effects on the initial 10-sec gelstrength, for 0, 1 & 2% nanoclay cement systems. However, 3% nanoclayincreases the 10-sec gel strength from 9 lbf/100 ft² to 13 lbf/100 ft².A similar trend is observed for the 10-min gel strength results as shownin FIG. 6.

Effect of Nanoclay on Compressive Strength

The compressive strength of cement system is an indicator of theintegrity and stability of cement to sustain long-term imposed stresses.Cement slurry should develop the compressive strength early and makestrong bonds with walls of the well after the placement, so that thedrilling operations can be resumed in short time. The pumping of cementefficiently, placing it safely on time, assuring cement integrity afterplacement (prior to resuming drilling operation) are the issues to beconsidered. Therefore, compressive strength tests were conducted toevaluate the development of cement strength with time utilizing theultrasonic cement analyzer (UCA) and to determine cement bondingstability after set utilizing the conventional compressive strength test(crushing).

The evolution of compressive strength of the cement systems, includingthe base mix, mixes with 1%, 2%, 3% & 4% nanoclay and simple Class Gcement was measured using the ultrasonic cement analyzer (UCA) underhigh temperature (290° F.) and pressure (4666 Psi) for 48 hours. FIG. 7shows the evolution of compressive strength for plain Type-G cementslurry.

When simple Class G cement was subjected to high temperature andpressure conditions, the rate of compressive strength development washigh initially due to fast hydration. After a maximum compressivestrength of about 2500 psi, the strength started to decrease due to hightemperatures in excess of 230° F. and formation of a weak porousstructure, called strength retrogression. To combat strengthretrogression in cement sheath and to reduce permeability at hightemperature, silica flour in the range of 30%-40% was added to theClass-G cement (Iverson et al. 2010). Therefore, in base mix and mixeswith nanoclay 35% BWOC silica flour was added to the cement design tocombat strength retrogression at high temperature. FIG. 8 is a typicalcurve showing the evolution of compressive strength of cement mix with1% nanoclay. The compressive strengths at 24 and 48 hours hydrationunder HPHT conditions for various mixes using UCA is shown in FIG. 9.Table 6 shows the compressive strength development at 12, 18, 24 and 48hours after subjecting to HPHT conditions for various mixes.

TABLE 6 Compressive Strength Results Psi at Different Time Durations 12,18, 74 & 48 hours) Time (HH:MM) Class G Base Mix 1% NC 2% NC 3% NC 4% NC12:00 2487 2833 2919 3048 3749 3299 18:00 2698 5707 5844 5340 5229 470224:00 2744 6467 6690 6206 6093 5431 48:00 — 6812 7190 6550 6918 6074

It can be seen from Table 6, that the compressive strength of cementmixes with nanoclay up to 3% BWOC results in higher compressive strengthas compared to the base mix at an age of 12 hours. 1% nanoclay resultsin significantly higher compressive strength at 24 and 48 hours ascompared to the base mix. For 2% and 3% nanoclay, the compressivestrength increases with time. For example for 3% nanoclay thecompressive strength increases from 6093 psi at 24 hours to 6918 psi at48 hours.

Table 7 shows the time required for cement system to develop acompressive strength of 50 psi, 500 psi and 2000 psi. These compressivestrengths are considered sufficient enough to support the steelcasing/liner prior to resuming the drilling operation. The transitionperiod between developing a compressive strength of 50 psi and 500 psiis important and needed to be as short as possible to avoid long waitingtime on cement before resuming drilling operation. Cement slurry ofsimple Class G cement has shortest time to attain the 500 psicompressive strength as it gains the strength within 2 hours which showsits ability to set early. But Class G cement alone is not a good choiceto inject in HPHT wells. Cement system having nanoclay percentage of(3.0% BWOC) yielded in the shortest transition period (24 minutes) ofgaining compressive strength from 50 psi to 500 psi while the cementslurry having 0, 1, 2 and 4% Nanoclay yielded on transition periods of27, 26, 25 & 30 minutes respectively with insignificant difference.

TABLE 7 Time to Gain Compressive Strengths of 50, 500 and 2000 PsiCompressive strength Class G Base Mix 1% NC 2% NC 3% NC 4% NC Psi Time (HH:MM) 50 01:25 03:33 03:34 03:79 03:40 03:38 500 01:58 04:00 04:0003:54 04:04 04:08 2000 07:03 09:28 08:02 07:51 05:49 06:07

Time to gain 2000 psi compressive strength is important in perforationsand stimulations. The cement mix with 3% nanoclay has the shortest timeduration to gain 2000 psi compressive strength. The 3% nanoclay cementsystem has low compressive strength after 48 hours but it has advantageof gaining early compressive strengths. The base mix has a significantlyhigher time period to obtain 2000 psi strength as compared to the mixeswith nanoclay.

Compressive Strength with Destructive Testing

FIG. 10 shows the compressive strength test results on selected cementsystems by crushing cubes. From results, it is shown that a cementsystem having 1% nanoclay has high compressive strength as compared toother cement systems. At 2% nanoclay, the compressive strength is low ascompared to base mix but 3% nanoclay results in higher compressivestrength as compared to the 2% nanoclay.

Effect of Nanoclay on Permeability

Permeability determines the ability of fluid to flow at differentpressure and is important in ensuring the long term integrity of thecement sheath by preventing fluid migration. FIG. 11 and FIG. 12 showthe effects of nanoclay on the permeability and porosity of cement aftercuring at 24 hours. When simple class G cement is subjected to hightemperature and pressure conditions, it results in high porosity (36%)and permeability (0.358 md). The base mix with various admixtures forHPHT applications has low permeability and porosity. Incorporation ofnanoclay in the cement mix decreases the permeability and porosity ofthe cement system. Addition of nanoclay by 1% BWOC results in furtherreduction of permeability. The permeability however, increases with 2%and 3% nanoclay. The porosity, on the other hand decreases for 1% and 2%nanoclay in the mix but increases at 3% nanoclay.

Thus, the foregoing discussion discloses and describes merely exemplaryembodiments of the present disclosure. As will be understood by thoseskilled in the art, the present disclosure may be embodied in otherspecific forms without departing from the spirit or essentialcharacteristics thereof. Accordingly, the disclosure of the presentdisclosure is intended to be illustrative, but not limiting of the scopeof the disclosure, as well as other claims. The disclosure, includingany readily discernible variants of the teachings herein, define, inpart, the scope of the foregoing claim terminology such that noinventive subject matter is dedicated to the public.

1-17. (canceled) 18: A dry cement blend composition, comprising: silica,a dispersant, a hydraulic cement and an organically modified nanoclay,wherein the organically modified nanoclay is present in an amount offrom 1% to less than 4% by weight of the hydraulic cement, wherein theorganically modified nanoclay is a montmorillonite nanoclay formed fromchlorite clay mineral having octahedral sheets, where Fe or Mg is acentral cation, wherein the organically modified nanoclay is modified bya quaternary organo-ammonium salt and comprises nanolayers of less than1 nm in thickness and about 2-10 microns in width or length. 19: Thecomposition of claim 18, further comprising at least one additiveselected from the group consisting of silica flour, an expanding agent,a dispersant, a fluid loss control agent, a retarder, a defoamer, adensity reducing additive, a density enhancing weighting agent, afoaming agent, and a friction reducing agent. 20: The composition ofclaim 18, wherein the hydraulic cement is at least one selected from thegroup consisting of an API class A Portland cement, an API class HPortland cement, and an API class G Portland cement. 21: The compositionof claim 18, wherein the hydraulic cement is a Saudi Type G hydrauliccement. 22: The composition of claim 18, wherein the organicallymodified nanoclay has a mean particle size of 6 to 10 microns. 23: A wetcement slurry composition, comprising water and the composition of claim18, wherein a weight ratio of the water:the hydraulic cement is 0.4-0.5.24: The composition of claim 23, which has a density of 8-20 lb/gal. 25:The composition of claim 23, which has a plastic viscosity of 131-245CP. 26: The composition of claim 23, wherein the water is fresh water orsalt water. 27: A cured cement obtained by curing the composition ofclaim 23.